Discover who we are, what we believe in and the people behind REO, and learn how our culture, expertise and approach help us create meaningful impact for our clients and their customers.

Explore the latest insights, ideas and practical resources from our experts, designed to help you understand your customers, improve digital experiences and drive meaningful growth.

Performance Marketing

Build better digital experiences

Reach more customers and turn attention into measurable growth. We combine paid, organic, content and social strategies to maximise visibility, acquisition and ROI across every channel.

Insight & Research

Data-driven decisions

See what’s actually happening, not just what a dashboard suggests. We connect user research, data insights, data governance and digital analytics into one evidence base that sharpens every decision.

Experience & Design

Accelerate digital growth

Turn insight into measurable growth. Our experience services combine data, experimentation and optimisation to improve digital experiences, increase conversion and drive better business outcomes.

Accessibility & Inclusion

Design for everyone

Create digital experiences that work for everyone. We combine accessibility expertise, inclusive user testing, training and strategy to remove barriers, build lasting capability and make inclusion part of how your organisation works.

Back to Resource Hub

Writing about disability

REO Digital

Author, REO

PUBLISHED

23rd Mar 2026

READ TIME

4 minutes

CATEGORY

Guide

An inclusive language guide for content and marketing teams

Why this matters

The words we choose shape how people are seen and treated. Inclusive language helps you communicate in a way that is accurate respectful and human, without making disability the “story” unless it’s relevant.

Core principles

1) Put the person first but don’t force one style

Different people prefer different language. Some prefer:

Identity-first:“disabled person” “Deaf person” “autistic person”
Person-first:“person with a disability” “person with epilepsy”

There isn’t one universal rule, but whenever you can, follow the individual’s preference.

2) Mention disability only when it’s relevant

  • If disability isn’t important to the message don’t include it.
  • Avoid describing someone as disabled as a default detail especially when it adds no meaning.

3) Avoid “medical” or “victim” framing

Steer away from language that:

  • Treats people as patients
  • Implies tragedy suffering or helplessness
  • Suggests a person is defined by a condition

Aim for neutral factual descriptions.

4) Avoid euphemisms and “inspiration” framing

Terms like “handicapable” “differently abled” or “special needs” are often used to avoid saying “disabled”, and can feel patronising. In most cases use direct plain terms.

5) Be careful with metaphors and casual phrases

Many common sayings use disability as a negative metaphor (“blind to” “deaf to” “crazy”). These can normalise stigma. Choose alternatives that mean what you actually intend.

Quick choices: what to say instead

Collective terms

Avoid:

  • “the disabled”
  • “able-bodied”

Use instead:

  • disabled people
  • non-disabled people

Notes:

  • Many people use “Deaf community” (often capital D) as a cultural identity.
  • Some people who access support may prefer “people with health conditions or impairments” in certain contexts.

Condition language: keep it neutral

Avoid phrases that imply pity or suffering:

  • “suffers from”
  • “victim of”
  • “afflicted by”

Use instead:

  • “has [condition]”
  • “is [disabled / Deaf / blind]” (if that’s the person’s preference)
  • “uses [assistive tech]” (e.g. “uses a wheelchair” “uses a screen reader”)

Mobility and access needs

Avoid:

  • “confined to a wheelchair”
  • “wheelchair-bound”

Use instead:

  • wheelchair user
  • uses a wheelchair (a wheelchair is a tool for independence not confinement)

Disability terms to avoid (and safer alternatives)

Here’s a practical set you can include in an internal style guide.

Avoid outdated or offensive terms

Avoid:

  • “handicapped”
  • “cripple” “spastic” “midget”
  • “insane” “mad” “psycho” “lunatic”
  • “retarded” “mongoloid”
  • “deaf and dumb” “deaf-mute”
  • “the blind”

Use instead:

  • disabled person / disabled people
  • person with cerebral palsy (or preferred term)
  • person with restricted growth / short stature (or preferred term)
  • person with a mental health condition
  • person with an intellectual disability / learning disability (regional usage varies)
  • Deaf person / hard of hearing person / BSL user (when relevant)
  • blind person / people with visual impairments / blind and partially sighted people

Avoid ableist metaphors and casual insults

Avoid:

  • “blind to the facts”
  • “turn a deaf ear”
  • “crazy idea”
  • “that’s lame”
  • “are you insane?”

Use instead:

  • “ignored the facts”
  • “refused to listen”
  • “unexpected / unrealistic / confusing”
  • “unhelpful / weak / ineffective”
  • “that doesn’t make sense”

Simple rule:

Say what you mean without using disability as shorthand for “bad”.

Describing severity or capability: proceed carefully

Labels like “high functioning” / “low functioning” can be reductive and are widely disliked.

Prefer:

  • “needs support with…”
  • “uses…”
  • “has difficulty with…”
  • “significant” rather than “severe” (when you need a qualifier)

Be specific about the context not a global judgement.

Behaviour tips for respectful communication

  • Speak to disabled people the same way you speak to anyone else: adult to adult
  • Don’t speak for someone or finish their sentences
  • If someone has an interpreter or companion address the person directly
  • If you’re unsure about language and you can ask ask
  • Don’t freeze through fear of getting it wrong, aim to be respectful and adjust when corrected

A simple “decision checklist” for writers

Before publishing ask:

  • Is disability relevant here?
  • Am I describing the person in a neutral factual way?
  • Have I avoided pity inspiration or medical framing?
  • Have I avoided euphemisms and negative metaphors?
  • If this is about a real person do we know their preferred language?